| |
The Great
Explosion
There is something absurd, and insidious, about the reign of the Darwin
paradigm. We are constantly trumpeted with science, then offered nothing but
a kind of Darwinian myth on the evolution of man, one that is grossly
inadequate, and what’s more undocumented. Looking at the current portrait of
the descent of humans we are confronted with a genuine mystery, especially
as the transition to modern humanity occurs very quickly, at the end of the
three million year stretch from Australopithecus.
The public deserves to know that Darwinism has failed to explain human
evolution via natural selection, and the question left open. The evidence of
a Great Explosion between 100 to 50K BCE (properly critiqued by other
evidence of incipient stages of this several hundred years prior) leading
anatomically modern man to behaviorally modern man is a major empirical
exception to Darwinian logic. It would be honest of scientists to
acknowledge this, and restore the integrity of the subject, by confessing
our ignorance.
And it must be noted that the study of the eonic effect probably gives us
a clue to what we are missing, and to the complexity of what constitutes
real evolution, for humans, at least. Everything that is suspicious in the
current account or accounts of the Great Explosion falls into place with the
approach seen in the eonic model. That proves nothing of course, but we can
see that the Darwinian scenario is useless, if not fraudulent.
|
|
