Descent Of Man Revisited

Book Blog

Descent Of Man Revisited header image 2

Why no theory of human evolution? paleontologists confused by Darwinism

June 23rd, 2012 · No Comments

When You Can’t Answer the Argument, Attack the Credentials of the Person Offering It
David Klinghoffer June 22, 2012 4:29 PM | Permalink
Some critics of Science and Human Origins charge that the authors have no business writing about the subject because they aren’t paleoanthropologists. One anonymous critic posted on Amazon that because Ann Gauger, Doug Axe and Casey Luskin have degrees in the wrong fields, they can be safely ignored. What a relief that must be for Darwin defenders!

This nonsense is typical of Darwinists who have so confused themselves they think they have an explanation to human evolution. In fact, they have very little, the sequence of the fossil record is not able to explain human evolution, for the simple reason we don’t have detailed maps of the full species-situation under transformation.
The paleontologists are so dogmaticaly off the mark that, to the contrary, outsiders are needed.

This is one of the points made by DMR: it gives a very strong clue to how homo sapiens probably evolved.

Tags: Uncategorized